Studi Strategici ed Intelligence… for dummies

New al-Qaeda Outfit Announces its Presence in Algeria

Published by Silendo on Giugno 3, 2005

By Stephen Ulph

Militant Islamist forums have circulated a statement dated May 8 purporting to announce the formation of a new al-Qaeda cell in Algeria. The group, Qa’idat al-Jihad fi al-Jaza’ir (al-Qaeda [base] of the Jihad in Algeria), has modeled its name on the group led by Abu Mus’ab al-Zarqawi, which is known as Qa’idat al-Jihad fi Bilad al-Rafidayn (al-Qaeda of the Jihad in the Land of the Two Rivers). Signed by one Abu Suheib Miliani, the group is laying claim to an ‘official’ status, and are using this status to call together the remnants of the Algerian mujahideen who are refusing the government amnesty, to join a "new project".

In December last year a similar announcement was made on the jihadi website al-Ma’sada of the formation of a new al-Qaeda group in Algeria (see Terrorism Focus Vol.2 issue 1). On this occasion the group called itself Tanzim al-Qaeda fi Bilad al-Berber, (The Organization of al-Qaeda in the Land of the Berbers). The posting detailed how the ‘Nur Brigade’, an affiliate to the Groupe salafiste pour la prédication et le combat (GSPC), was transferring its allegiance to Osama bin Laden [www.alm2sda.net]. It is not known if the earlier group is related to this present group, or even existed in fact.

This latest Arabic statement, included in full on the jihadist Kalimat al-Haqq site [www.rightword.net], begins by giving its assessment of the situation of the mujahideen in Algeria. "The Algerian regime has succeeded in entangling the Islamic groups in what no God-fearing Muslim would give his blood or honor for, and which has cost these Islamic groups their credibility in the Nation" and goes on to describe how "the Islamic groups who have taken up their positions in the hills are living through a period of crisis and agitation, poised between responding to the amnesty and [thus] descending into ignominy, or remaining where they are." It then broadens the analysis to illustrate how the regimes in Algeria and Egypt have succeeded in putting down the previous attempts by Islamists at power, and how the leadership of these Islamists movements have caved in, all the while claiming religious justification as an act of ‘repentance’.

The ‘al-Qaeda of the Jihad in Algeria’, it underlines, "is unblemished [by such things] in that its active leadership is an international leadership free of [geographically located] pressures, which means its leadership can not be arrested or ‘turned,’ a fact which guarantees that the fire of jihad will burn on."

The statement then goes on to give some interesting details of its proposed strategy. The role of the new group’s leadership, it explains, "in the first phase will be one of incitement and direction, which will leave the field open to all who wish to operate in this arena in small cells independent of each other." Each operation, however, is to be flagged as a ‘al-Qaeda of the Jihad in Algeria’ operation, and the aim is to "consolidate media communications and dispatch video tapes of operations to satellite channels or jihadi websites on the internet" [www.rightword.net].

In conscious imitation of the al-Qaeda model, the statement attempts to provide a ‘legal’ dressing to its projected operations. It clearly takes into account the type of objections voiced by Algerian contributors to jihadi forums, deploring the attacks on "powerless soldiers or policemen" which "only widens the gap between [the Islamists] and the people" (See Terrorism Focus, Vol 2 issue 7). "From day one" it insists, "we say that we are not responsible for operations targeting innocent people, believers and the Algerian people. Our targets are Jews, Crusaders — their prominent people, embassies and interests – for they are the [real] enemy against whom the [Muslim] Nation is united in calling for attacks to be mounted in every place."

The declaration ends with an unexpected call for Ali Benhadj, the leader of the Front islamique du Salut (FIS) (the most significant Islamist organization in Algeria, but one that has eschewed violence) to renew his leadership of a jihadist force. "The solution to the defeat which has befallen the Muslims in Algeria," it argues, "lies in your hands … you need only disappear to a safe place where you can act to direct the deluge of those who place their trust in you … Your leadership is vital now … We call you to a matter which will upset all the scales."

The tone of the statement, with its appeal to patriotic values, betrays anxiety and demoralization at a time when there is strong evidence that the response to the government amnesty is increasing in momentum. Last month the chief of Algeria’s General Amnesty Commission (CNGAG), Abdel Razzak Ismail, said that at least 400 terrorists were prepared to lay down their arms. The question is, therefore, whether the statement announces a genuine new formation, or represents a last ditch attempt to rally the mujahid remnants under a new banner, in the hope that increased prestige will replace the shortfall in muscle.

Posted in: Blog
Tagged:
al qaeda, algeria

Chi Sono

Silendo

Un appassionato di relazioni internazionali e studi strategici. In particolar modo di questioni connesse con l'intelligence.
Per contattarmi:
info@silendo.org

Leggi tutto...

Accedi

Tweet di @Silendo_org

Archivio

Categorie

Tags

affari strategici afganistan algeria al qaeda arabia saudita australia cina criminalità organizzata cyber-mf difesa egitto estremismo francia germania gran bretagna guerriglia hamas hezbollah india intelligence iran iraq ISIS israele italia Leadership e classe dirigente libano libia libri medio-oriente minkiate nato nucleare e risorse energetiche pakistan palestina russia sentimenti sicurezza nazionale siria somalia stati uniti strategic foresight studi di intelligence terrorismo turchia

Blogroll

  • Affari Internazionali
  • Agentura
  • American Enterprise Institute
  • ANSSI
  • AOL Defense
  • Arms Control Wonk
  • Asia Centre
  • Asia Times
  • Aspen Institute Italia
  • ASPI
  • Atlantic Council
  • Baker Institute
  • Banca d'Italia
  • BBC
  • Belfer Center
  • Bellingcat
  • Bertelsmann Foundation
  • BESA Center
  • Bibliografia sull'intelligence
  • Bloomberg
  • Bloomberg View
  • Brookings Institution
  • Bruegel
  • Carnegie Endowment
  • Carnegie Middle East Center
  • Carnegie Moscow Center
  • CASD
  • Center for a New American Security
  • Center for Economic Policy Research
  • Center for European Reform
  • Center for Naval Analyses
  • Center for Nonproliferation Studies
  • Centre d'Analyse Stratégique
  • Centro Einaudi
  • Centro Studi Confindustria
  • CEPR
  • CF2R
  • Chatham House
  • China Leadership Monitor
  • CISAC
  • Combating Terrorism Center
  • Comparative Strategy
  • COPASIR
  • Corriere della Sera
  • Council on Foreign Relations
  • CSBA
  • CSFRS
  • CSI – CIA
  • CSIS
  • CSS
  • CSS Strategic Trends Analysis
  • Danger Room
  • DCAF
  • Defence News
  • East online
  • ECFR
  • ECIR
  • Economist
  • Egmont Institute
  • Epistemes
  • EsadeGeo
  • ESPAS
  • EU Institute for Security Studies
  • Eurasianet
  • European Policy Centre
  • Fareed Zakaria
  • FAS
  • FAS – CRS
  • FAS – DNI
  • Fas – Strategic Security Blog
  • Financial Times
  • Foreign Affairs
  • Foreign Policy
  • Foreign Policy – National Security
  • FPRI
  • FRS
  • FSI – Stanford
  • Geneva Centre for Security Policy
  • German Council on Foreign Relations
  • German Marshall Fund
  • Global Trends 2030
  • Globalsecurity.org
  • Governo italiano
  • H-Net
  • Harvard International Review
  • HCSS
  • Heritage Foundation
  • Horizon Scanning Centre
  • Horizon Scanning Centre – Toolkit
  • House Armed Services Committee
  • House Committee on Homeland Security
  • House Committee on International Relations
  • House Intelligence Committee
  • HSPI
  • https://sinocism.com/
  • Hudson Institute
  • IAEA
  • IDSA
  • IEA
  • IFRI
  • IHEDN
  • IISS
  • IMF
  • INET
  • Infinity Journal
  • Infoguerre
  • INSS – Israele
  • INSS – USA
  • Institute for Government
  • Intelligence & National Security
  • Intelligence Studies Section
  • IntellNews
  • International Crisis Group
  • International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence
  • International Security
  • International Security Studies
  • IRIS
  • ISIS
  • Istituto Affari Internazionali
  • Istituto Italiano di Studi Strategici
  • Jamestown Foundation
  • JFK School of Government
  • JFQ
  • Joshua Rogin
  • Journal of Military and Strategic Studies
  • Journal of Strategic Security
  • Journal of Strategic Studies
  • Kings of War
  • Lowy Institute
  • LSE IDEAS Blog
  • Macro Polo
  • McKinsey Global Institute
  • Mercator Institute
  • Merlin
  • Military Review
  • Miller Center
  • MIT Center
  • Munich Security Conference
  • National Bureau of Asian Research
  • National Defense Intelligence College
  • National Intelligence Council
  • National Interest Online
  • National Security Archive
  • National Security Journal
  • Naval War College Review
  • NCTC
  • New America Foundation
  • New York Times
  • Newsweek
  • Nixon Center
  • Notre Europe
  • OCSE
  • ODNI
  • On Think Tanks
  • Orbis
  • Oxford Analytica
  • Oxford Intelligence Group
  • Papers – APSA
  • Papers – ISA
  • Parameters
  • Perspectives on Terrorism
  • Peter Bergen
  • Peterson Institute
  • Phillips P. Obrien
  • Proceedings
  • Project 2049
  • Project Syndicate
  • Public Intelligence
  • RAND
  • Real Instituto Elcano
  • Reuters
  • Robert Kaplan
  • RSIS
  • RUSI
  • Secrecy News
  • Security Studies
  • Senate Armed Services Committee
  • Senate Committee on Foreign Relations
  • Senate Committee on Homeland Security
  • Senate Committee on Intelligence
  • Sentinel
  • SGDSN
  • Silicon Continent
  • SIPRI
  • SISR – Intelligence italiana
  • Source&Methods
  • South Asia Analysis Group
  • Spiegel International
  • Stephen Walt
  • Stimson Center
  • Strategic & Defence Studies Centre
  • Strategic Studies Institute
  • Strategic Studies Quarterly
  • Strategika
  • Stratfor
  • Studies in Conflict & Terrorism
  • Terrorism and Political Violence
  • The Back Channel
  • The Diplomat
  • The Interpreter
  • The Overoholt Group
  • The Strategist
  • The Strategy Bridge
  • Time
  • Transatlantic Academy
  • U.S.-China Commission
  • UN Millennium Project
  • Venus in Arms
  • VOX
  • Wall Street Journal
  • War on the Rocks
  • Washington Institute for Near East Policy
  • Washington Post
  • WCFIA – Harvard
  • Wilson International Center
  • World Economic Forum
Locations of visitors to this page
© 2026 SILENDO Design & Dev by Artemida Srl