Studi Strategici ed Intelligence… for dummies

Little Authority for New Intelligence Post

Published by Silendo on Ottobre 15, 2005

By DOUGLAS JEHL
Published: October 14, 2005

WASHINGTON, Oct. 13 – A new Central Intelligence Agency office intended to provide more coordination over American spying operations will wield only limited authority, leaving the Defense Department and the F.B.I. free to carry out an increasing array of human intelligence missions without central operational control, two senior intelligence officials said Thursday.

The director of the new office, as head of a national clandestine service, will instead be responsible primarily for setting standards and rules designed to minimize conflicts between the agencies, whose human spying operations in the United States and abroad have been expanding rapidly and are expected to continue to do so, the officials told reporters at a briefing.

In written statements issued on Thursday, John D. Negroponte, the new director of national intelligence, and Porter J. Goss, the C.I.A. director, said the new arrangements would improve the quality of American human spying. That has been a goal recommended by Congress, the Sept. 11 commission and others in reviews conducted in the last two years. President Bush pledged last year to increase human spying operations at the Pentagon and the F.B.I. by 50 percent in the next five years.

But Senator Pat Roberts, the Kansas Republican who is chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, described the changes as "a negotiated settlement" between the various agencies. Mr. Roberts expressed reservations about what he called "this latest reorganization," saying he would have preferred that Mr. Negroponte exert his authority to "manage human intelligence collection worldwide." Mr. Negroponte took over the new post in April under a law enacted last year.

The limited power to be granted to the new coordinator underscores the degree to which the Pentagon, the F.B.I. and the C.I.A. have retained considerable autonomy even under the new system led by Mr. Negroponte, whose job was created as part of an effort to impose more central control over intelligence agencies.

"We won’t tell the F.B.I. how to do their business, and we don’t tell the D.O.D. how to do their business," one of the two senior intelligence officials said of the role to be played by the C.I.A.

A second senior intelligence official said Mr. Negroponte’s office would limit its role in overseeing human spying operations to broad, strategic direction, rather than asserting operational control.

Mr. Negroponte and his deputies do not anticipate "getting into the weeds of tactical day-to-day operations," said that second official, speaking at a briefing at C.I.A. headquarters. The two officials were from the C.I.A. and Mr. Negroponte’s office, but the briefing was provided to reporters on condition that they not be identified by name.

The new system leaves the C.I.A. as the pre-eminent agency in charge of human spying, a mission it has had since its creation in 1947. The new clandestine service replaces the directorate of operations, the C.I.A. branch responsible for stealing secrets, recruiting spies and carrying out covert operations around the world.

The decision to allow the C.I.A. to maintain its designated role as the national human intelligence manager comes despite opposition from Mr. Roberts and other Republicans on the Senate Intelligence Committee, who had urged that Mr. Negroponte’s office assume that management task. In a report last month, the Republican majority on the panel said the C.I.A.’s record of coordinating other agencies’ activities had been weak, as underscored by intelligence failures on terrorism and Iraq.

But Democrats on the committee opposed that recommendation, saying it would be "at best premature" to strip the C.I.A. of its powers. In a statement issued on Thursday, Senator John D. Rockefeller IV of West Virginia, the ranking Democrat on the committee, said Mr. Negroponte had made "the right decision" and would give Mr. Goss "the tools he needs to ensure an effective and coordinated effort across all agencies involved with human intelligence."

Technically, Mr. Goss, as director of the C.I.A., is to be designated as national human intelligence manager. That is a role comparable to those once played by the director of the National Security Agency, the national signals intelligence manager; and the director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, the national imagery intelligence manager.

Under the new structure, however, Mr. Goss will delegate those day-to-day responsibilities to a new director of the national clandestine service, and he has appointed the current deputy director for operations to assume that post, the C.I.A. said. That official, a long-serving C.I.A. officer with considerable experience in Latin America, remains undercover and cannot be publicly named, the agency said.

One deputy director of the clandestine service will be responsible for managing the C.I.A.’s own clandestine service, and a second deputy will be responsible for "facilitation, coordination and deconfliction" of broader human spying operations, missions that are increasingly being carried out by the F.B.I.’s new national security branch, the Defense Intelligence Agency’s human intelligence service and Special Operations Forces, as well as the C.I.A. The service will also include a unit responsible for covert operations and another branch responsible for providing scientific and technological support.

James L. Pavitt, who retired in 2004 as deputy director for operations, said he believed that the impact of the restructuring would be limited.

"A change in the table of organization, the ‘wiring diagram,’ will not substantively change the basics of the business," Mr. Pavitt said in an e-mail exchange on Thursday.

Mr. Pavitt said he believed that the old directorate of operations, now renamed the national clandestine service, would "continue to carry the real burden."

Posted in: Blog
Tagged:
intelligence, stati uniti

Chi Sono

Silendo

Un appassionato di relazioni internazionali e studi strategici. In particolar modo di questioni connesse con l'intelligence.
Per contattarmi:
info@silendo.org

Leggi tutto...

Accedi

Tweet di @Silendo_org

Archivio

Categorie

Tags

affari strategici afganistan algeria al qaeda arabia saudita australia cina criminalità organizzata cyber-mf difesa egitto estremismo francia germania gran bretagna guerriglia hamas hezbollah india intelligence iran iraq ISIS israele italia Leadership e classe dirigente libano libia libri medio-oriente minkiate nato nucleare e risorse energetiche pakistan palestina russia sentimenti sicurezza nazionale siria somalia stati uniti strategic foresight studi di intelligence terrorismo turchia

Blogroll

  • Affari Internazionali
  • Agentura
  • American Enterprise Institute
  • ANSSI
  • AOL Defense
  • Arms Control Wonk
  • Asia Centre
  • Asia Times
  • Aspen Institute Italia
  • ASPI
  • Atlantic Council
  • Baker Institute
  • Banca d'Italia
  • BBC
  • Belfer Center
  • Bellingcat
  • Bertelsmann Foundation
  • BESA Center
  • Bibliografia sull'intelligence
  • Bloomberg
  • Bloomberg View
  • Brookings Institution
  • Bruegel
  • Carnegie Endowment
  • Carnegie Middle East Center
  • Carnegie Moscow Center
  • CASD
  • Center for a New American Security
  • Center for Economic Policy Research
  • Center for European Reform
  • Center for Naval Analyses
  • Center for Nonproliferation Studies
  • Centre d'Analyse Stratégique
  • Centro Einaudi
  • Centro Studi Confindustria
  • CEPR
  • CF2R
  • Chatham House
  • China Leadership Monitor
  • CISAC
  • Combating Terrorism Center
  • Comparative Strategy
  • COPASIR
  • Corriere della Sera
  • Council on Foreign Relations
  • CSBA
  • CSFRS
  • CSI – CIA
  • CSIS
  • CSS
  • CSS Strategic Trends Analysis
  • Danger Room
  • DCAF
  • Defence News
  • East online
  • ECFR
  • ECIR
  • Economist
  • Egmont Institute
  • Epistemes
  • EsadeGeo
  • ESPAS
  • EU Institute for Security Studies
  • Eurasianet
  • European Policy Centre
  • Fareed Zakaria
  • FAS
  • FAS – CRS
  • FAS – DNI
  • Fas – Strategic Security Blog
  • Financial Times
  • Foreign Affairs
  • Foreign Policy
  • Foreign Policy – National Security
  • FPRI
  • FRS
  • FSI – Stanford
  • Geneva Centre for Security Policy
  • German Council on Foreign Relations
  • German Marshall Fund
  • Global Trends 2030
  • Globalsecurity.org
  • Governo italiano
  • H-Net
  • Harvard International Review
  • HCSS
  • Heritage Foundation
  • Horizon Scanning Centre
  • Horizon Scanning Centre – Toolkit
  • House Armed Services Committee
  • House Committee on Homeland Security
  • House Committee on International Relations
  • House Intelligence Committee
  • HSPI
  • https://sinocism.com/
  • Hudson Institute
  • IAEA
  • IDSA
  • IEA
  • IFRI
  • IHEDN
  • IISS
  • IMF
  • INET
  • Infinity Journal
  • Infoguerre
  • INSS – Israele
  • INSS – USA
  • Institute for Government
  • Intelligence & National Security
  • Intelligence Studies Section
  • IntellNews
  • International Crisis Group
  • International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence
  • International Security
  • International Security Studies
  • IRIS
  • ISIS
  • Istituto Affari Internazionali
  • Istituto Italiano di Studi Strategici
  • Jamestown Foundation
  • JFK School of Government
  • JFQ
  • Joshua Rogin
  • Journal of Military and Strategic Studies
  • Journal of Strategic Security
  • Journal of Strategic Studies
  • Kings of War
  • Lowy Institute
  • LSE IDEAS Blog
  • Macro Polo
  • McKinsey Global Institute
  • Mercator Institute
  • Merlin
  • Military Review
  • Miller Center
  • MIT Center
  • Munich Security Conference
  • National Bureau of Asian Research
  • National Defense Intelligence College
  • National Intelligence Council
  • National Interest Online
  • National Security Archive
  • National Security Journal
  • Naval War College Review
  • NCTC
  • New America Foundation
  • New York Times
  • Newsweek
  • Nixon Center
  • Notre Europe
  • OCSE
  • ODNI
  • On Think Tanks
  • Orbis
  • Oxford Analytica
  • Oxford Intelligence Group
  • Papers – APSA
  • Papers – ISA
  • Parameters
  • Perspectives on Terrorism
  • Peter Bergen
  • Peterson Institute
  • Phillips P. Obrien
  • Proceedings
  • Project 2049
  • Project Syndicate
  • Public Intelligence
  • RAND
  • Real Instituto Elcano
  • Reuters
  • Robert Kaplan
  • RSIS
  • RUSI
  • Secrecy News
  • Security Studies
  • Senate Armed Services Committee
  • Senate Committee on Foreign Relations
  • Senate Committee on Homeland Security
  • Senate Committee on Intelligence
  • Sentinel
  • SGDSN
  • Silicon Continent
  • SIPRI
  • SISR – Intelligence italiana
  • Source&Methods
  • South Asia Analysis Group
  • Spiegel International
  • Stephen Walt
  • Stimson Center
  • Strategic & Defence Studies Centre
  • Strategic Studies Institute
  • Strategic Studies Quarterly
  • Strategika
  • Stratfor
  • Studies in Conflict & Terrorism
  • Terrorism and Political Violence
  • The Back Channel
  • The Diplomat
  • The Interpreter
  • The Overoholt Group
  • The Strategist
  • The Strategy Bridge
  • Time
  • Transatlantic Academy
  • U.S.-China Commission
  • UN Millennium Project
  • Venus in Arms
  • VOX
  • Wall Street Journal
  • War on the Rocks
  • Washington Institute for Near East Policy
  • Washington Post
  • WCFIA – Harvard
  • Wilson International Center
  • World Economic Forum
Locations of visitors to this page
© 2025 SILENDO Design & Dev by Artemida Srl