Studi Strategici ed Intelligence… for dummies

CIA Chief Sees Threat in Chinese Military Buildup

Published by Silendo on Giugno 2, 2005

Pacific Rim Bureau (CNSNews.com) – An annual CIA global intelligence assessment has for the first time since 9/11 characterized China’s military buildup as a threat to the United States.

"Improved Chinese capabilities threaten U.S. forces in the region," CIA director Porter Goss told a hearing of the Senate Intelligence Committee Wednesday.

"Beijing’s military modernization and military buildup could tilt the balance of power in the Taiwan Strait," he said.

The CIA chief, who took office last September, painted a picture of an assertive and self-assured China.

"China is increasingly confident and active on the international stage, trying to ensure that it has a voice on international issues and secures access to natural resources and to counter what it sees as United States’ efforts to contain or encircle it."

Goss’s assessment comes at a time the European Union is moving to lift a 16-year-old embargo on arms sales to China, despite Pentagon concerns that U.S. forces could in any future conflict over Taiwan face Chinese troops armed with advanced European weaponry.

The U.S. is committed to help Taiwan defend itself. Beijing regards the island as a rebel province and has vowed to use force if necessary to prevent it from formalizing its de facto independence.

"If Beijing decides that Taiwan is taking steps toward permanent separation that exceeds Beijing’s tolerance, we assess China is prepared to respond with varying levels of force," Goss told the committee.

He said China last year increased the number of ballistic missiles facing Taiwan and "continues to develop more robust, survivable nuclear-armed missiles as well as conventional capabilities for use in a regional conflict."

Each February, the CIA head briefs the committee on worldwide security challenges and threats.

Transcripts of testimony presented in 2002, 2003 and 2004 indicate an assessment of China that included positive aspects of U.S.-China cooperation in the post-9/11 era.

Although referring to concerns about military buildup, portions relating to China did not use the words "threat" or "threaten," settling instead for "risk" and "challenge."

Last year, then-CIA director George Tenet cited Beijing’s cooperation with the U.S. in the war on terrorism and attempts to resolve the North Korean nuclear standoff.

In the previous two years, too, Tenet referred to U.S.-China cooperation, saying in 2003 Beijing was emphasizing a "constructive relationship" and "actively seeking a degree of engagement in areas of mutual interest," and in 2002 referring to "our shared fight against terrorism."

By contrast, Goss’s testimony this week omitted any mention of bilateral cooperation, either in counter-terror efforts or on the North Korean nuclear issue.

Security analysts estimate that China’s true defense budget — as opposed to its declared military spending — has reached $80 billion, the third-highest in the world after the U.S. and Russia.

Russia and other former Soviet states supply most of China’s weapons, but Beijing has been pressing the EU to end its ban on arms sales, imposed after the 1989 crushing of pro-democracy protests in Tiananmen Square. The U.S., Taiwan and key U.S. ally Japan are strongly opposed to any lifting of the embargo.

In a defense doctrine last December, the Japanese government for the first time said China and its military buildup posed a regional risk.

"It is necessary to watch China’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs, the modernization of its navy and air force, and its attempts to expand marine activities," the document said.

The Japanese shift drew a sharp response from Beijing, which called the decision to describe China as a regional risk "totally groundless and extremely irresponsible."

Relations between Japan and China have cooled in recent years, despite strong trade links.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.

Fonte: http://www.townhall.com/news/politics/200502/FOR20050217b.shtml

Posted in: Blog
Tagged:
cina, intelligence

Chi Sono

Silendo

Un appassionato di relazioni internazionali e studi strategici. In particolar modo di questioni connesse con l'intelligence.
Per contattarmi:
info@silendo.org

Leggi tutto...

Accedi

Tweet di @Silendo_org

Archivio

Categorie

Tags

affari strategici afganistan algeria al qaeda arabia saudita australia cina criminalità organizzata cyber-mf difesa egitto estremismo francia germania gran bretagna guerriglia hamas hezbollah india intelligence iran iraq ISIS israele italia Leadership e classe dirigente libano libia libri medio-oriente minkiate nato nucleare e risorse energetiche pakistan palestina russia sentimenti sicurezza nazionale siria somalia stati uniti strategic foresight studi di intelligence terrorismo turchia

Blogroll

  • Affari Internazionali
  • Agentura
  • American Enterprise Institute
  • ANSSI
  • AOL Defense
  • Arms Control Wonk
  • Asia Centre
  • Asia Times
  • Aspen Institute Italia
  • ASPI
  • Atlantic Council
  • Baker Institute
  • Banca d'Italia
  • BBC
  • Belfer Center
  • Bellingcat
  • Bertelsmann Foundation
  • BESA Center
  • Bibliografia sull'intelligence
  • Bloomberg
  • Bloomberg View
  • Brookings Institution
  • Bruegel
  • Carnegie Endowment
  • Carnegie Middle East Center
  • Carnegie Moscow Center
  • CASD
  • Center for a New American Security
  • Center for Economic Policy Research
  • Center for European Reform
  • Center for Naval Analyses
  • Center for Nonproliferation Studies
  • Centre d'Analyse Stratégique
  • Centro Einaudi
  • Centro Studi Confindustria
  • CEPR
  • CF2R
  • Chatham House
  • China Leadership Monitor
  • CISAC
  • Combating Terrorism Center
  • Comparative Strategy
  • COPASIR
  • Corriere della Sera
  • Council on Foreign Relations
  • CSBA
  • CSFRS
  • CSI – CIA
  • CSIS
  • CSS
  • CSS Strategic Trends Analysis
  • Danger Room
  • DCAF
  • Defence News
  • East online
  • ECFR
  • ECIR
  • Economist
  • Egmont Institute
  • Epistemes
  • EsadeGeo
  • ESPAS
  • EU Institute for Security Studies
  • Eurasianet
  • European Policy Centre
  • Fareed Zakaria
  • FAS
  • FAS – CRS
  • FAS – DNI
  • Fas – Strategic Security Blog
  • Financial Times
  • Foreign Affairs
  • Foreign Policy
  • Foreign Policy – National Security
  • FPRI
  • FRS
  • FSI – Stanford
  • Geneva Centre for Security Policy
  • German Council on Foreign Relations
  • German Marshall Fund
  • Global Trends 2030
  • Globalsecurity.org
  • Governo italiano
  • H-Net
  • Harvard International Review
  • HCSS
  • Heritage Foundation
  • Horizon Scanning Centre
  • Horizon Scanning Centre – Toolkit
  • House Armed Services Committee
  • House Committee on Homeland Security
  • House Committee on International Relations
  • House Intelligence Committee
  • HSPI
  • https://sinocism.com/
  • Hudson Institute
  • IAEA
  • IDSA
  • IEA
  • IFRI
  • IHEDN
  • IISS
  • IMF
  • INET
  • Infinity Journal
  • Infoguerre
  • INSS – Israele
  • INSS – USA
  • Institute for Government
  • Intelligence & National Security
  • Intelligence Studies Section
  • IntellNews
  • International Crisis Group
  • International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence
  • International Security
  • International Security Studies
  • IRIS
  • ISIS
  • Istituto Affari Internazionali
  • Istituto Italiano di Studi Strategici
  • Jamestown Foundation
  • JFK School of Government
  • JFQ
  • Joshua Rogin
  • Journal of Military and Strategic Studies
  • Journal of Strategic Security
  • Journal of Strategic Studies
  • Kings of War
  • Lowy Institute
  • LSE IDEAS Blog
  • Macro Polo
  • McKinsey Global Institute
  • Mercator Institute
  • Merlin
  • Military Review
  • Miller Center
  • MIT Center
  • Munich Security Conference
  • National Bureau of Asian Research
  • National Defense Intelligence College
  • National Intelligence Council
  • National Interest Online
  • National Security Archive
  • National Security Journal
  • Naval War College Review
  • NCTC
  • New America Foundation
  • New York Times
  • Newsweek
  • Nixon Center
  • Notre Europe
  • OCSE
  • ODNI
  • On Think Tanks
  • Orbis
  • Oxford Analytica
  • Oxford Intelligence Group
  • Papers – APSA
  • Papers – ISA
  • Parameters
  • Perspectives on Terrorism
  • Peter Bergen
  • Peterson Institute
  • Phillips P. Obrien
  • Proceedings
  • Project 2049
  • Project Syndicate
  • Public Intelligence
  • RAND
  • Real Instituto Elcano
  • Reuters
  • Robert Kaplan
  • RSIS
  • RUSI
  • Secrecy News
  • Security Studies
  • Senate Armed Services Committee
  • Senate Committee on Foreign Relations
  • Senate Committee on Homeland Security
  • Senate Committee on Intelligence
  • Sentinel
  • SGDSN
  • Silicon Continent
  • SIPRI
  • SISR – Intelligence italiana
  • Source&Methods
  • South Asia Analysis Group
  • Spiegel International
  • Stephen Walt
  • Stimson Center
  • Strategic & Defence Studies Centre
  • Strategic Studies Institute
  • Strategic Studies Quarterly
  • Strategika
  • Stratfor
  • Studies in Conflict & Terrorism
  • Terrorism and Political Violence
  • The Back Channel
  • The Diplomat
  • The Interpreter
  • The Overoholt Group
  • The Strategist
  • The Strategy Bridge
  • Time
  • Transatlantic Academy
  • U.S.-China Commission
  • UN Millennium Project
  • Venus in Arms
  • VOX
  • Wall Street Journal
  • War on the Rocks
  • Washington Institute for Near East Policy
  • Washington Post
  • WCFIA – Harvard
  • Wilson International Center
  • World Economic Forum
Locations of visitors to this page
© 2026 SILENDO Design & Dev by Artemida Srl